Study 1c Codebook (ARv1 Dataset)

library(here)

## here() starts at /Volumes/GoogleDrive/Shared drives/Nami Dissertation/R Project

knitr::opts_chunk$set(
    error = TRUE,
    message = TRUE,
    warning = TRUE
)
ggplot2::theme_set(ggplot2::theme_bw())

library(codebook)
codebook_data <- rio::import(here("data_public/Study1c_public.rds"))

codebook(codebook_data)

## Loading required namespace: GPArotation

Metadata

Description

Dataset name: codebook_data

The dataset has N=290 rows and 46 columns. 287 rows have no missing values on any column.

Metadata for search engines

• Date published: 2021-01-20

x id finished acceptance closeness age sex race target_age target_sex target_race heart1 heart2 heart3 valence1 valence2 valence3 arousal2 dominance2 nts_belonging1 nts_belonging2 nts_belonging3 nts_belonging4 nts_esteem1 nts_esteem2 nts_esteem3 nts_control1 nts_control2 nts_control3 nts_meaning1 nts_meaning2 nts_meaning3 nts_identity1 nts_identity2 nts_identity3 ladder nts_belonging1R nts_belonging2R nts_belonging3R nts_esteem1R nts_meaning1R nts_meaning3R nts_belonging_mean nts_esteem_mean nts_control_mean nts_meaning_mean nts_mean

#Variables

id

Participant ID

Distribution

Distribution of values for id

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist
id	Participant ID	numeric	0	1	1	146	298	146.4655	85.3028	▇▇▇▇▇

finished

Finished the survey

Distribution

Distribution of values for finished

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	max	whitespace
finished	Finished the survey	character	0	1	2	0	1	1	0

acceptance

Acceptance condition

Distribution

Distribution of values for acceptance

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	median	max	whitespace	n_value_labels
acceptance	Acceptance condition	haven_labelled	0	1	2	0	1	NA	1	0	2

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
1	1
2	0

closeness

Closeness to the essay target

Distribution

Distribution of values for closeness

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	median	max	whitespace	n_value_labels
closeness	Closeness to the essay target	haven_labelled	0	1	2	0	1	NA	1	0	2

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
1	0
2	1

age

Age

Distribution

Distribution of values for age

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist
age	Age	numeric	0	1	18	31	66	33.21379	9.617017	▆▇▂▂▁

sex

Sex

Distribution

Distribution of values for sex

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	median	max	whitespace	n_value_labels
sex	Sex	haven_labelled	0	1	2	0	1	NA	1	0	2

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
1	1
2	2

race

Race

Distribution

Distribution of values for race

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	median	max	whitespace	n_value_labels
race	Race	haven_labelled	0	1	6	0	1	NA	1	0	7

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
1	1
2	2
3	3
4	4
5	5
6	6
7	7

target_age

Age of the essay target

Distribution

Distribution of values for target_age

3 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist
target_age	Age of the essay target	numeric	3	0.9896552	1	32	229	36.0662	16.87073	▇▂▁▁▁

target_sex

Sex of the essay target

Distribution

Distribution of values for target_sex

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	median	max	whitespace	n_value_labels
target_sex	Sex of the essay target	haven_labelled	0	1	2	0	1	NA	1	0	2

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
1	1
2	2

target_race

Race of the essay target

Distribution

Distribution of values for target_race

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	median	max	whitespace	n_value_labels
target_race	Race of the essay target	haven_labelled	0	1	7	0	1	NA	1	0	7

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
1	1
2	2
3	3
4	4
5	5
6	6
7	7

heart1

Heart Manikin - Time 1

Distribution

Distribution of values for heart1

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
heart1	Heart Manikin - Time 1	haven_labelled	0	1	1	7	9	6.693103	1.810854	10	▁▂▂▅▅▇▇▆

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
lonely, rejected, isolated, disconnected	1
2	2
3	3
4	4
5	5
6	6
7	7
8	8
9	9
cared for, accepted, loved, connected	10

heart2

Heart Manikin - Time 2

Distribution

Distribution of values for heart2

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
heart2	Heart Manikin - Time 2	haven_labelled	0	1	1	5	9	5.113793	2.964172	10	▇▃▂▂▂▃▅▅

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
lonely, rejected, isolated, disconnected	1
2	2
3	3
4	4
5	5
6	6
7	7
8	8
9	9
cared for, accepted, loved, connected	10

heart3

Heart Manikin - Time 3

Distribution

Distribution of values for heart3

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
heart3	Heart Manikin - Time 3	haven_labelled	0	1	1	7	10	6.641379	2.385585	10	▂▂▂▅▅▇▆▇

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
lonely, rejected, isolated, disconnected	1
2	2
3	3
4	4
5	5
6	6
7	7
8	8
9	9
cared for, accepted, loved, connected	10

valence1

Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 1

Distribution

Distribution of values for valence1

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
valence1	Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 1	haven_labelled	0	1	1	7	9	6.575862	1.785012	10	▁▂▁▅▅▇▅▅

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
unhappy, annoyed, unsatisfied, bored	1
2	2
3	3
4	4
5	5
6	6
7	7
8	8
9	9
happy, pleased, satisfied, hopeful	10

valence2

Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2

Distribution

Distribution of values for valence2

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
valence2	Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2	haven_labelled	0	1	1	5.5	9	5.082759	2.843078	10	▇▅▂▂▃▃▃▅

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
unhappy, annoyed, unsatisfied, bored	1
2	2
3	3
4	4
5	5
6	6
7	7
8	8
9	9
happy, pleased, satisfied, hopeful	10

valence3

Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 3

Distribution

Distribution of values for valence3

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
valence3	Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 3	haven_labelled	0	1	2	7	12	6.996552	2.63789	10	▂▁▃▇▃▁▁▃

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
unhappy, annoyed, unsatisfied, bored	1
2	2
3	3
4	4
5	5
6	6
7	7
8	8
9	9
happy, pleased, satisfied, hopeful	10

arousal2

Arousal Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2

Distribution

Distribution of values for arousal2

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
arousal2	Arousal Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2	haven_labelled	0	1	1	6	9	5.465517	2.07152	9	▅▃▃▇▆▇▅▂

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
relaxed, calm, sleepy, sluggish	1
2	2
3	3
4	4
5	5
6	6
7	7
8	8
excited, frenzied, wide-awake, aroused	9

dominance2

Dominance Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2

Distribution

Distribution of values for dominance2

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
dominance2	Dominance Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2	haven_labelled	0	1	1	5	9	4.924138	2.264768	9	▇▆▅▇▆▆▅▂

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
submissive, influenced, controlled by others	1
2	2
3	3
4	4
5	5
6	6
7	7
8	8
in control, important, dominant, autonomous	9

nts_belonging1

How rejected did you feel?

Distribution

Distribution of values for nts_belonging1

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
nts_belonging1	How rejected did you feel?	haven_labelled	0	1	0	48	100	43.51034	37.58048	2	▇▁▁▁▂▂▃▃

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
The least I could ever possibly feel	0
The most I could ever possibly feel	100

nts_belonging2

How disconnected did you feel?

Distribution

Distribution of values for nts_belonging2

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
nts_belonging2	How disconnected did you feel?	haven_labelled	0	1	0	46	100	43.41379	37.49677	2	▇▁▁▁▂▂▃▃

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
The least I could ever possibly feel	0
The most I could ever possibly feel	100

nts_belonging3

How how isolated did you feel?

Distribution

Distribution of values for nts_belonging3

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
nts_belonging3	How how isolated did you feel?	haven_labelled	0	1	0	38	100	42.41724	37.49604	2	▇▁▁▁▂▂▂▃

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
The least I could ever possibly feel	0
The most I could ever possibly feel	100

nts_esteem1

How meaningless did you feel

Distribution

Distribution of values for nts_esteem1

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
nts_esteem1	How meaningless did you feel	haven_labelled	0	1	0	29	100	38.4069	34.79669	2	▇▂▁▂▂▂▂▃

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
The least I could ever possibly feel	0
The most I could ever possibly feel	100

nts_meaning1

How meaningless did you feel?

Distribution

Distribution of values for nts_meaning1

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
nts_meaning1	How meaningless did you feel?	haven_labelled	0	1	0	24	100	35.98621	36.04889	2	▇▂▁▁▂▂▁▂

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
The least I could ever possibly feel	0
The most I could ever possibly feel	100

nts_meaning3

How insignificant did you feel?

Distribution

Distribution of values for nts_meaning3

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
nts_meaning3	How insignificant did you feel?	haven_labelled	0	1	0	36	100	40.1069	36.93348	2	▇▂▁▂▂▂▂▃

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
The least I could ever possibly feel	0
The most I could ever possibly feel	100

nts_identity1

How threatened was your self-identity?

Distribution

Distribution of values for nts_identity1

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
nts_identity1	How threatened was your self-identity?	haven_labelled	0	1	0	11	100	26.97241	30.17009	2	▇▁▁▂▁▁▁▁

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
The least I could ever possibly feel	0
The most I could ever possibly feel	100

nts_identity2

How threatened was your sense of self?

Distribution

Distribution of values for nts_identity2

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
nts_identity2	How threatened was your sense of self?	haven_labelled	0	1	0	12	100	27.13793	30.14592	2	▇▂▁▁▂▁▁▁

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
The least I could ever possibly feel	0
The most I could ever possibly feel	100

nts_identity3

How much did you question who you are as a person?

Distribution

Distribution of values for nts_identity3

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
nts_identity3	How much did you question who you are as a person?	haven_labelled	0	1	0	18	100	31.81379	33.13378	2	▇▂▁▁▁▂▂▂

Value labels

Response choices

name	value
The least I could ever possibly feel	0
The most I could ever possibly feel	100

ladder

MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status

Distribution

Distribution of values for ladder

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	hist
ladder	MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status	numeric	0	1	0	50	100	48.89655	19.0834	▂▆▇▅▁

Scale: nts_belonging_mean

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Distribution of scale nts_belonging_mean

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	nts_belonging1R, nts_belonging2R, nts_belonging3R & nts_belonging4
Observations:	290
Positive correlations:	6
Number of correlations:	6
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.14
Omega (hierarchical):	0.11
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.14
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.96
Coefficient H:	0.97
Coefficient Alpha:	0.95

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as at least one item seems to have more than 8 levels; the highest number of distinct levels is 85 and the highest range is 101. This last number needs to be lower than 9 for the polychoric function to work. If this is unexpected, you may want to check for outliers.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.495, 0.28, 0.145 & 0.08

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
nts_belonging1R	0.899
nts_belonging2R	0.965
nts_belonging3R	0.954
nts_belonging4	0.832

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
nts_belonging1R	0.927
nts_belonging2R	0.963
nts_belonging3R	0.957
nts_belonging4	0.889

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
nts_belonging1R	56.4897	52	1412.2923	37.5805	79	2.2068	0	20	99	100	-0.071	-1.635	0.0821	290	0	290
nts_belonging2R	56.5862	54	1406.0081	37.4968	78	2.2019	0	20	98.5	100	-0.0971	-1.6448	0.0745	290	0	290
nts_belonging3R	57.5828	61.5	1405.9533	37.496	77	2.2018	0	21	98	100	-0.1777	-1.5921	0.0654	290	0	290
nts_belonging4	49.5517	50	1429.3554	37.8068	77	2.2201	0	10	87	100	0.0248	-1.6346	0.0907	290	0	290

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
nts_belonging1R	NA	numeric	NA	0	1	0	52	100	56.48966	37.58048	NA	▆▃▂▁▇
nts_belonging2R	NA	numeric	NA	0	1	0	54	100	56.58621	37.49677	NA	▅▃▂▂▇
nts_belonging3R	NA	numeric	NA	0	1	0	62	100	57.58276	37.49604	NA	▅▃▂▂▇
nts_belonging4	How accepted did you feel?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	0	1	0	50	100	49.55172	37.80682	2	▇▃▂▂▂▂▃▇

Scale: nts_esteem_mean

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Distribution of scale nts_esteem_mean

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	nts_esteem1R, nts_esteem2 & nts_esteem3
Observations:	290
Positive correlations:	3
Number of correlations:	3
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.91
Omega (hierarchical):	0.90
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.91
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.94
Coefficient H:	0.99
Coefficient Alpha:	0.90

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as at least one item seems to have more than 8 levels; the highest number of distinct levels is 94 and the highest range is 101. This last number needs to be lower than 9 for the polychoric function to work. If this is unexpected, you may want to check for outliers.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.514, 0.403 & 0.083

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
nts_esteem1R	0.704
nts_esteem2	0.921
nts_esteem3	0.993

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
nts_esteem1R	0.845
nts_esteem2	0.940
nts_esteem3	0.958

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
nts_esteem1R	61.5931	71	1210.8096	34.7967	65	2.0433	0	29	94	100	-0.4206	-1.3136	0.03	290	0	290
nts_esteem2	49.0414	50	1209.846	34.7828	69	2.0425	0	12	83	100	-0.0035	-1.4282	0.0531	290	0	290
nts_esteem3	49.0897	50	1126.8362	33.5684	65	1.9712	0	15	81	100	0.0125	-1.3926	0.0459	290	0	290

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
nts_esteem1R	NA	numeric	NA	0	1	0	71	100	61.59310	34.79669	NA	▃▂▂▂▇
nts_esteem2	How important did you feel?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	0	1	0	50	100	49.04138	34.78284	2	▇▃▂▃▂▃▃▆
nts_esteem3	How insignificant did you feel?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	0	1	0	50	100	49.08966	33.56838	2	▇▃▃▃▃▃▃▆

Scale: nts_control_mean

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Distribution of scale nts_control_mean

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	nts_control1, nts_control2 & nts_control3
Observations:	290
Positive correlations:	3
Number of correlations:	3
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.90
Omega (hierarchical):	0.00
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.90
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.93
Coefficient H:	0.99
Coefficient Alpha:	0.90

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as at least one item seems to have more than 8 levels; the highest number of distinct levels is 91 and the highest range is 101. This last number needs to be lower than 9 for the polychoric function to work. If this is unexpected, you may want to check for outliers.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.481, 0.369 & 0.15

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
nts_control1	0.772
nts_control2	0.994
nts_control3	0.822

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
nts_control1	0.877
nts_control2	0.950
nts_control3	0.899

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
nts_control1	38.5759	34.5	840.4665	28.9908	48	1.7024	0	12	60	100	0.4003	-0.9097	0.0306	290	0	290
nts_control2	38.9966	40	869.0346	29.4794	51	1.7311	0	10	61	100	0.2899	-1.0422	0.04	290	0	290
nts_control3	40.1345	40.5	843.7777	29.0479	50	1.7057	0	14	64	100	0.1968	-1.1067	0.035	290	0	290

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
nts_control1	How influential did you feel?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	0	1	0	34	100	38.57586	28.99080	2	▇▅▃▃▅▃▂▂
nts_control2	How much control did you feel like you had?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	0	1	0	40	100	38.99655	29.47939	2	▇▃▂▅▃▃▂▂
nts_control3	How much ability to significantly alter events did you feel like you had?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	0	1	0	40	100	40.13448	29.04785	2	▇▅▃▅▅▅▂▂

Scale: nts_meaning_mean

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Distribution of scale nts_meaning_mean

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	nts_meaning1R, nts_meaning2 & nts_meaning3R
Observations:	290
Positive correlations:	3
Number of correlations:	3
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.83
Omega (hierarchical):	0.03
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.83
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.85
Coefficient H:	0.87
Coefficient Alpha:	0.82

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as at least one item seems to have more than 8 levels; the highest number of distinct levels is 90 and the highest range is 101. This last number needs to be lower than 9 for the polychoric function to work. If this is unexpected, you may want to check for outliers.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.212, 0.501 & 0.288

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1
nts_meaning1R	0.899
nts_meaning2	0.662
nts_meaning3R	0.780

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	PC1
nts_meaning1R	0.898
nts_meaning2	0.810
nts_meaning3R	0.865

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
nts_meaning1R	64.0138	76.5	1299.5223	36.0489	70	2.1169	0	29	99	100	-0.4831	-1.3264	0.0376	290	0	290
nts_meaning2	49.2448	50	1190.6146	34.5053	66	2.0262	0	15.5	82	100	-0.0087	-1.4604	0.0616	290	0	290
nts_meaning3R	59.8931	64.5	1364.082	36.9335	77	2.1688	0	22	99	100	-0.2682	-1.5334	0.0547	290	0	290

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
nts_meaning1R	NA	numeric	NA	0	1	0	76	100	64.01379	36.04889	NA	▃▂▂▂▇
nts_meaning2	How important did you feel?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	0	1	0	50	100	49.24483	34.50528	2	▇▅▂▃▃▃▅▆
nts_meaning3R	NA	numeric	NA	0	1	0	64	100	59.89310	36.93348	NA	▅▃▂▂▇

Scale: nts_mean

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Distribution of scale nts_mean

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

---

Scale diagnosis

Reliability (internal consistency) estimates

Scale structure

Information about this scale

Dataframe:	res$dat
Items:	nts_belonging4, nts_esteem2, nts_esteem3, nts_control1, nts_control2, nts_control3, nts_meaning2, nts_belonging1R, nts_belonging2R, nts_belonging3R, nts_esteem1R, nts_meaning1R & nts_meaning3R
Observations:	290
Positive correlations:	78
Number of correlations:	78
Percentage positive correlations:	100

Estimates assuming interval level

Omega (total):	0.97
Omega (hierarchical):	0.81
Revelle’s Omega (total):	0.97
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB):	0.97
Coefficient H:	0.97
Coefficient Alpha:	0.96

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as at least one item seems to have more than 8 levels; the highest number of distinct levels is 94 and the highest range is 101. This last number needs to be lower than 9 for the polychoric function to work. If this is unexpected, you may want to check for outliers.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

8.722, 1.526, 0.492, 0.433, 0.359, 0.303, 0.288, 0.258, 0.201, 0.157, 0.116, 0.076 & 0.069

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)

	ML1	ML2
nts_belonging4	0.589	0.379
nts_esteem2	0.318	0.649
nts_esteem3	0.319	0.679
nts_control1	-0.066	0.803
nts_control2	-0.059	0.916
nts_control3	-0.093	0.888
nts_meaning2	0.349	0.545
nts_belonging1R	0.902	0.005
nts_belonging2R	0.967	-0.030
nts_belonging3R	0.995	-0.054
nts_esteem1R	0.712	0.150
nts_meaning1R	0.832	0.013
nts_meaning3R	0.740	0.013

Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)

	TC1	TC2
nts_belonging4	0.630	0.360
nts_esteem2	0.448	0.545
nts_esteem3	0.441	0.584
nts_control1	-0.084	0.899
nts_control2	-0.025	0.943
nts_control3	-0.036	0.898
nts_meaning2	0.410	0.530
nts_belonging1R	0.925	-0.015
nts_belonging2R	0.932	0.002
nts_belonging3R	0.965	-0.031
nts_esteem1R	0.804	0.081
nts_meaning1R	0.911	-0.051
nts_meaning3R	0.854	-0.076

Item descriptives

	mean	median	var	sd	IQR	se	min	q1	q3	max	skew	kurt	dip	n	NA	valid
nts_belonging4	49.5517	50	1429.3554	37.8068	77	2.2201	0	10	87	100	0.0248	-1.6346	0.0907	290	0	290
nts_esteem2	49.0414	50	1209.846	34.7828	69	2.0425	0	12	83	100	-0.0035	-1.4282	0.0531	290	0	290
nts_esteem3	49.0897	50	1126.8362	33.5684	65	1.9712	0	15	81	100	0.0125	-1.3926	0.0459	290	0	290
nts_control1	38.5759	34.5	840.4665	28.9908	48	1.7024	0	12	60	100	0.4003	-0.9097	0.0306	290	0	290
nts_control2	38.9966	40	869.0346	29.4794	51	1.7311	0	10	61	100	0.2899	-1.0422	0.04	290	0	290
nts_control3	40.1345	40.5	843.7777	29.0479	50	1.7057	0	14	64	100	0.1968	-1.1067	0.035	290	0	290
nts_meaning2	49.2448	50	1190.6146	34.5053	66	2.0262	0	15.5	82	100	-0.0087	-1.4604	0.0616	290	0	290
nts_belonging1R	56.4897	52	1412.2923	37.5805	79	2.2068	0	20	99	100	-0.071	-1.635	0.0821	290	0	290
nts_belonging2R	56.5862	54	1406.0081	37.4968	78	2.2019	0	20	98.5	100	-0.0971	-1.6448	0.0745	290	0	290
nts_belonging3R	57.5828	61.5	1405.9533	37.496	77	2.2018	0	21	98	100	-0.1777	-1.5921	0.0654	290	0	290
nts_esteem1R	61.5931	71	1210.8096	34.7967	65	2.0433	0	29	94	100	-0.4206	-1.3136	0.03	290	0	290
nts_meaning1R	64.0138	76.5	1299.5223	36.0489	70	2.1169	0	29	99	100	-0.4831	-1.3264	0.0376	290	0	290
nts_meaning3R	59.8931	64.5	1364.082	36.9335	77	2.1688	0	22	99	100	-0.2682	-1.5334	0.0547	290	0	290

Scattermatrix

Scatterplot

---

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name	label	data_type	value_labels	n_missing	complete_rate	min	median	max	mean	sd	n_value_labels	hist
nts_belonging4	How accepted did you feel?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	0	1	0	50	100	49.55172	37.80682	2	▇▃▂▂▂▂▃▇
nts_esteem2	How important did you feel?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	0	1	0	50	100	49.04138	34.78284	2	▇▃▂▃▂▃▃▆
nts_esteem3	How insignificant did you feel?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	0	1	0	50	100	49.08966	33.56838	2	▇▃▃▃▃▃▃▆
nts_control1	How influential did you feel?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	0	1	0	34	100	38.57586	28.99080	2	▇▅▃▃▅▃▂▂
nts_control2	How much control did you feel like you had?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	0	1	0	40	100	38.99655	29.47939	2	▇▃▂▅▃▃▂▂
nts_control3	How much ability to significantly alter events did you feel like you had?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	0	1	0	40	100	40.13448	29.04785	2	▇▅▃▅▅▅▂▂
nts_meaning2	How important did you feel?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	0	1	0	50	100	49.24483	34.50528	2	▇▅▂▃▃▃▅▆
nts_belonging1R	NA	numeric	NA	0	1	0	52	100	56.48966	37.58048	NA	▆▃▂▁▇
nts_belonging2R	NA	numeric	NA	0	1	0	54	100	56.58621	37.49677	NA	▅▃▂▂▇
nts_belonging3R	NA	numeric	NA	0	1	0	62	100	57.58276	37.49604	NA	▅▃▂▂▇
nts_esteem1R	NA	numeric	NA	0	1	0	71	100	61.59310	34.79669	NA	▃▂▂▂▇
nts_meaning1R	NA	numeric	NA	0	1	0	76	100	64.01379	36.04889	NA	▃▂▂▂▇
nts_meaning3R	NA	numeric	NA	0	1	0	64	100	59.89310	36.93348	NA	▅▃▂▂▇

Missingness report

Codebook table

name	label	data_type	value_labels	scale_item_names	n_missing	complete_rate	n_unique	empty	min	median	max	mean	sd	whitespace	n_value_labels	hist
id	Participant ID	numeric	NA	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	1	146	298	146.465517	85.302802	NA	NA	▇▇▇▇▇
finished	Finished the survey	character	NA	NA	0	1.0000000	2	0	1	NA	1	NA	NA	0	NA	NA
acceptance	Acceptance condition	haven_labelled	1. Acceptance, 0. Rejection	NA	0	1.0000000	2	0	1	NA	1	NA	NA	0	2	NA
closeness	Closeness to the essay target	haven_labelled	0. Distant Other, 1. Close Other	NA	0	1.0000000	2	0	1	NA	1	NA	NA	0	2	NA
age	Age	numeric	NA	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	18	31	66	33.213793	9.617017	NA	NA	▆▇▂▂▁
sex	Sex	haven_labelled	1. Male, 2. Female	NA	0	1.0000000	2	0	1	NA	1	NA	NA	0	2	NA
race	Race	haven_labelled	1. White, 2. Black, 3. Asian, 4. Hispanic, 5. Native American, 6. Bi-Racial or Multi-Racial, 7. Other	NA	0	1.0000000	6	0	1	NA	1	NA	NA	0	7	NA
target_age	Age of the essay target	numeric	NA	NA	3	0.9896552	NA	NA	1	32	229	36.066202	16.870728	NA	NA	▇▂▁▁▁
target_sex	Sex of the essay target	haven_labelled	1. Male, 2. Female	NA	0	1.0000000	2	0	1	NA	1	NA	NA	0	2	NA
target_race	Race of the essay target	haven_labelled	1. White, 2. Black, 3. Asian, 4. Hispanic, 5. Native American, 6. Bi-Racial or Multi-Racial, 7. Other	NA	0	1.0000000	7	0	1	NA	1	NA	NA	0	7	NA
heart1	Heart Manikin - Time 1	haven_labelled	1. lonely, rejected, isolated, disconnected, 2. 2, 3. 3, 4. 4, 5. 5, 6. 6, 7. 7, 8. 8, 9. 9, 10. cared for, accepted, loved, connected	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	1	7.0	9	6.693103	1.810854	NA	10	▁▂▂▅▅▇▇▆
heart2	Heart Manikin - Time 2	haven_labelled	1. lonely, rejected, isolated, disconnected, 2. 2, 3. 3, 4. 4, 5. 5, 6. 6, 7. 7, 8. 8, 9. 9, 10. cared for, accepted, loved, connected	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	1	5.0	9	5.113793	2.964172	NA	10	▇▃▂▂▂▃▅▅
heart3	Heart Manikin - Time 3	haven_labelled	1. lonely, rejected, isolated, disconnected, 2. 2, 3. 3, 4. 4, 5. 5, 6. 6, 7. 7, 8. 8, 9. 9, 10. cared for, accepted, loved, connected	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	1	7.0	10	6.641379	2.385585	NA	10	▂▂▂▅▅▇▆▇
valence1	Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 1	haven_labelled	1. unhappy, annoyed, unsatisfied, bored, 2. 2, 3. 3, 4. 4, 5. 5, 6. 6, 7. 7, 8. 8, 9. 9, 10. happy, pleased, satisfied, hopeful	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	1	7.0	9	6.575862	1.785012	NA	10	▁▂▁▅▅▇▅▅
valence2	Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2	haven_labelled	1. unhappy, annoyed, unsatisfied, bored, 2. 2, 3. 3, 4. 4, 5. 5, 6. 6, 7. 7, 8. 8, 9. 9, 10. happy, pleased, satisfied, hopeful	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	1	5.5	9	5.082759	2.843078	NA	10	▇▅▂▂▃▃▃▅
valence3	Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 3	haven_labelled	1. unhappy, annoyed, unsatisfied, bored, 2. 2, 3. 3, 4. 4, 5. 5, 6. 6, 7. 7, 8. 8, 9. 9, 10. happy, pleased, satisfied, hopeful	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	2	7.0	12	6.996552	2.637890	NA	10	▂▁▃▇▃▁▁▃
arousal2	Arousal Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2	haven_labelled	1. relaxed, calm, sleepy, sluggish, 2. 2, 3. 3, 4. 4, 5. 5, 6. 6, 7. 7, 8. 8, 9. excited, frenzied, wide-awake, aroused	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	1	6.0	9	5.465517	2.071520	NA	9	▅▃▃▇▆▇▅▂
dominance2	Dominance Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2	haven_labelled	1. submissive, influenced, controlled by others, 2. 2, 3. 3, 4. 4, 5. 5, 6. 6, 7. 7, 8. 8, 9. in control, important, dominant, autonomous	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	1	5.0	9	4.924138	2.264768	NA	9	▇▆▅▇▆▆▅▂
nts_belonging1	How rejected did you feel?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	48.0	100	43.510345	37.580477	NA	2	▇▁▁▁▂▂▃▃
nts_belonging2	How disconnected did you feel?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	46.0	100	43.413793	37.496775	NA	2	▇▁▁▁▂▂▃▃
nts_belonging3	How how isolated did you feel?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	38.5	100	42.417241	37.496044	NA	2	▇▁▁▁▂▂▂▃
nts_belonging4	How accepted did you feel?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	50.0	100	49.551724	37.806818	NA	2	▇▃▂▂▂▂▃▇
nts_esteem1	How meaningless did you feel	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	29.0	100	38.406897	34.796690	NA	2	▇▂▁▂▂▂▂▃
nts_esteem2	How important did you feel?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	50.0	100	49.041379	34.782841	NA	2	▇▃▂▃▂▃▃▆
nts_esteem3	How insignificant did you feel?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	50.0	100	49.089655	33.568381	NA	2	▇▃▃▃▃▃▃▆
nts_control1	How influential did you feel?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	34.5	100	38.575862	28.990801	NA	2	▇▅▃▃▅▃▂▂
nts_control2	How much control did you feel like you had?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	40.0	100	38.996552	29.479393	NA	2	▇▃▂▅▃▃▂▂
nts_control3	How much ability to significantly alter events did you feel like you had?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	40.5	100	40.134483	29.047852	NA	2	▇▅▃▅▅▅▂▂
nts_meaning1	How meaningless did you feel?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	23.5	100	35.986207	36.048888	NA	2	▇▂▁▁▂▂▁▂
nts_meaning2	How important did you feel?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	50.0	100	49.244828	34.505283	NA	2	▇▅▂▃▃▃▅▆
nts_meaning3	How insignificant did you feel?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	35.5	100	40.106897	36.933480	NA	2	▇▂▁▂▂▂▂▃
nts_identity1	How threatened was your self-identity?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	11.0	100	26.972414	30.170093	NA	2	▇▁▁▂▁▁▁▁
nts_identity2	How threatened was your sense of self?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	12.0	100	27.137931	30.145924	NA	2	▇▂▁▁▂▁▁▁
nts_identity3	How much did you question who you are as a person?	haven_labelled	0. The least I could ever possibly feel, 100. The most I could ever possibly feel	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	18.0	100	31.813793	33.133783	NA	2	▇▂▁▁▁▂▂▂
ladder	MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status	numeric	NA	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	50	100	48.896552	19.083399	NA	NA	▂▆▇▅▁
nts_belonging1R	NA	numeric	NA	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	52	100	56.489655	37.580477	NA	NA	▆▃▂▁▇
nts_belonging2R	NA	numeric	NA	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	54	100	56.586207	37.496775	NA	NA	▅▃▂▂▇
nts_belonging3R	NA	numeric	NA	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	62	100	57.582759	37.496044	NA	NA	▅▃▂▂▇
nts_esteem1R	NA	numeric	NA	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	71	100	61.593103	34.796690	NA	NA	▃▂▂▂▇
nts_meaning1R	NA	numeric	NA	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	76	100	64.013793	36.048888	NA	NA	▃▂▂▂▇
nts_meaning3R	NA	numeric	NA	NA	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	64	100	59.893103	36.933480	NA	NA	▅▃▂▂▇
nts_belonging_mean	4 nts_belonging items aggregated by rowMeans	numeric	NA	nts_belonging1R, nts_belonging2R, nts_belonging3R, nts_belonging4	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	53	100	55.052586	35.123682	NA	NA	▆▅▂▂▇
nts_esteem_mean	3 nts_esteem items aggregated by rowMeans	numeric	NA	nts_esteem1R, nts_esteem2, nts_esteem3	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	52	100	53.241379	31.422338	NA	NA	▆▅▅▅▇
nts_control_mean	3 nts_control items aggregated by rowMeans	numeric	NA	nts_control1, nts_control2, nts_control3	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	40	100	39.235632	26.523492	NA	NA	▇▆▆▅▂
nts_meaning_mean	3 nts_meaning items aggregated by rowMeans	numeric	NA	nts_meaning1R, nts_meaning2, nts_meaning3R	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	58	100	57.717241	30.765095	NA	NA	▃▃▅▃▇
nts_mean	13 nts items aggregated by rowMeans	numeric	NA	nts_belonging4, nts_esteem2, nts_esteem3, nts_control1, nts_control2, nts_control3, nts_meaning2, nts_belonging1R, nts_belonging2R, nts_belonging3R, nts_esteem1R, nts_meaning1R, nts_meaning3R	0	1.0000000	NA	NA	0	53	100	51.599469	28.326876	NA	NA	▇▇▆▇▇

JSON-LD metadata

The following JSON-LD can be found by search engines, if you share this codebook publicly on the web.

{
  "name": "codebook_data",
  "datePublished": "2021-01-20",
  "description": "The dataset has N=290 rows and 46 columns.\n287 rows have no missing values on any column.\n\n\n## Table of variables\nThis table contains variable names, labels, and number of missing values.\nSee the complete codebook for more.\n\n[truncated]\n\n### Note\nThis dataset was automatically described using the [codebook R package](https://rubenarslan.github.io/codebook/) (version 0.9.2).",
  "keywords": ["id", "finished", "acceptance", "closeness", "age", "sex", "race", "target_age", "target_sex", "target_race", "heart1", "heart2", "heart3", "valence1", "valence2", "valence3", "arousal2", "dominance2", "nts_belonging1", "nts_belonging2", "nts_belonging3", "nts_belonging4", "nts_esteem1", "nts_esteem2", "nts_esteem3", "nts_control1", "nts_control2", "nts_control3", "nts_meaning1", "nts_meaning2", "nts_meaning3", "nts_identity1", "nts_identity2", "nts_identity3", "ladder", "nts_belonging1R", "nts_belonging2R", "nts_belonging3R", "nts_esteem1R", "nts_meaning1R", "nts_meaning3R", "nts_belonging_mean", "nts_esteem_mean", "nts_control_mean", "nts_meaning_mean", "nts_mean"],
  "@context": "http://schema.org/",
  "@type": "Dataset",
  "variableMeasured": [
    {
      "name": "id",
      "description": "Participant ID",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "finished",
      "description": "Finished the survey",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "acceptance",
      "description": "Acceptance condition",
      "value": "1. Acceptance,\n0. Rejection",
      "maxValue": "1",
      "minValue": "0",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "closeness",
      "description": "Closeness to the essay target",
      "value": "0. Distant Other,\n1. Close Other",
      "maxValue": "1",
      "minValue": "0",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "age",
      "description": "Age",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "sex",
      "description": "Sex",
      "value": "1. Male,\n2. Female",
      "maxValue": "2",
      "minValue": "1",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "race",
      "description": "Race",
      "value": "1. White,\n2. Black,\n3. Asian,\n4. Hispanic,\n5. Native American,\n6. Bi-Racial or Multi-Racial,\n7. Other",
      "maxValue": "7",
      "minValue": "1",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "target_age",
      "description": "Age of the essay target",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "target_sex",
      "description": "Sex of the essay target",
      "value": "1. Male,\n2. Female",
      "maxValue": "2",
      "minValue": "1",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "target_race",
      "description": "Race of the essay target",
      "value": "1. White,\n2. Black,\n3. Asian,\n4. Hispanic,\n5. Native American,\n6. Bi-Racial or Multi-Racial,\n7. Other",
      "maxValue": "7",
      "minValue": "1",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "heart1",
      "description": "Heart Manikin - Time 1",
      "value": "1. lonely, rejected, isolated, disconnected,\n2. 2,\n3. 3,\n4. 4,\n5. 5,\n6. 6,\n7. 7,\n8. 8,\n9. 9,\n10. cared for, accepted, loved, connected",
      "maxValue": 10,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "heart2",
      "description": "Heart Manikin - Time 2",
      "value": "1. lonely, rejected, isolated, disconnected,\n2. 2,\n3. 3,\n4. 4,\n5. 5,\n6. 6,\n7. 7,\n8. 8,\n9. 9,\n10. cared for, accepted, loved, connected",
      "maxValue": 10,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "heart3",
      "description": "Heart Manikin - Time 3",
      "value": "1. lonely, rejected, isolated, disconnected,\n2. 2,\n3. 3,\n4. 4,\n5. 5,\n6. 6,\n7. 7,\n8. 8,\n9. 9,\n10. cared for, accepted, loved, connected",
      "maxValue": 10,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "valence1",
      "description": "Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 1",
      "value": "1. unhappy, annoyed, unsatisfied, bored,\n2. 2,\n3. 3,\n4. 4,\n5. 5,\n6. 6,\n7. 7,\n8. 8,\n9. 9,\n10. happy, pleased, satisfied, hopeful",
      "maxValue": 10,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "valence2",
      "description": "Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2",
      "value": "1. unhappy, annoyed, unsatisfied, bored,\n2. 2,\n3. 3,\n4. 4,\n5. 5,\n6. 6,\n7. 7,\n8. 8,\n9. 9,\n10. happy, pleased, satisfied, hopeful",
      "maxValue": 10,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "valence3",
      "description": "Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 3",
      "value": "1. unhappy, annoyed, unsatisfied, bored,\n2. 2,\n3. 3,\n4. 4,\n5. 5,\n6. 6,\n7. 7,\n8. 8,\n9. 9,\n10. happy, pleased, satisfied, hopeful",
      "maxValue": 10,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "arousal2",
      "description": "Arousal Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2",
      "value": "1. relaxed, calm, sleepy, sluggish,\n2. 2,\n3. 3,\n4. 4,\n5. 5,\n6. 6,\n7. 7,\n8. 8,\n9. excited, frenzied, wide-awake, aroused",
      "maxValue": 9,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dominance2",
      "description": "Dominance Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2",
      "value": "1. submissive, influenced, controlled by others,\n2. 2,\n3. 3,\n4. 4,\n5. 5,\n6. 6,\n7. 7,\n8. 8,\n9. in control, important, dominant, autonomous",
      "maxValue": 9,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_belonging1",
      "description": "How rejected did you feel?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_belonging2",
      "description": "How disconnected did you feel?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_belonging3",
      "description": "How how isolated did you feel?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_belonging4",
      "description": "How accepted did you feel?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_esteem1",
      "description": "How meaningless did you feel",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_esteem2",
      "description": "How important did you feel?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_esteem3",
      "description": "How insignificant did you feel?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_control1",
      "description": "How influential did you feel?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_control2",
      "description": "How much control did you feel like you had?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_control3",
      "description": "How much ability to significantly alter events did you feel like you had?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_meaning1",
      "description": "How meaningless did you feel?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_meaning2",
      "description": "How important did you feel?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_meaning3",
      "description": "How insignificant did you feel?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_identity1",
      "description": "How threatened was your self-identity?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_identity2",
      "description": "How threatened was your sense of self?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_identity3",
      "description": "How much did you question who you are as a person?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "ladder",
      "description": "MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_belonging1R",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_belonging2R",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_belonging3R",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_esteem1R",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_meaning1R",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_meaning3R",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_belonging_mean",
      "description": "4 nts_belonging items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_esteem_mean",
      "description": "3 nts_esteem items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_control_mean",
      "description": "3 nts_control items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_meaning_mean",
      "description": "3 nts_meaning items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_mean",
      "description": "13 nts items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    }
  ]
}`