library(here)
## here() starts at /Volumes/GoogleDrive/Shared drives/Nami Dissertation/R Project
knitr::opts_chunk$set(
    error = TRUE,
    message = TRUE,
    warning = TRUE
)
ggplot2::theme_set(ggplot2::theme_bw())
library(codebook)
codebook_data <- rio::import(here("data_public/Study1c_public.rds"))
codebook(codebook_data)
## Loading required namespace: GPArotation

Metadata

Description

Dataset name: codebook_data

The dataset has N=290 rows and 46 columns. 287 rows have no missing values on any column.

Metadata for search engines
  • Date published: 2021-01-20
x
id
finished
acceptance
closeness
age
sex
race
target_age
target_sex
target_race
heart1
heart2
heart3
valence1
valence2
valence3
arousal2
dominance2
nts_belonging1
nts_belonging2
nts_belonging3
nts_belonging4
nts_esteem1
nts_esteem2
nts_esteem3
nts_control1
nts_control2
nts_control3
nts_meaning1
nts_meaning2
nts_meaning3
nts_identity1
nts_identity2
nts_identity3
ladder
nts_belonging1R
nts_belonging2R
nts_belonging3R
nts_esteem1R
nts_meaning1R
nts_meaning3R
nts_belonging_mean
nts_esteem_mean
nts_control_mean
nts_meaning_mean
nts_mean

#Variables

id

Participant ID

Distribution

Distribution of values for id

Distribution of values for id

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist
id Participant ID numeric 0 1 1 146 298 146.4655 85.3028 ▇▇▇▇▇

finished

Finished the survey

Distribution

Distribution of values for finished

Distribution of values for finished

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min max whitespace
finished Finished the survey character 0 1 2 0 1 1 0

acceptance

Acceptance condition

Distribution

Distribution of values for acceptance

Distribution of values for acceptance

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min median max whitespace n_value_labels
acceptance Acceptance condition haven_labelled 0 1 2 0 1 NA 1 0 2

Value labels

Response choices
name value
1 1
2 0

closeness

Closeness to the essay target

Distribution

Distribution of values for closeness

Distribution of values for closeness

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min median max whitespace n_value_labels
closeness Closeness to the essay target haven_labelled 0 1 2 0 1 NA 1 0 2

Value labels

Response choices
name value
1 0
2 1

age

Age

Distribution

Distribution of values for age

Distribution of values for age

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist
age Age numeric 0 1 18 31 66 33.21379 9.617017 ▆▇▂▂▁

sex

Sex

Distribution

Distribution of values for sex

Distribution of values for sex

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min median max whitespace n_value_labels
sex Sex haven_labelled 0 1 2 0 1 NA 1 0 2

Value labels

Response choices
name value
1 1
2 2

race

Race

Distribution

Distribution of values for race

Distribution of values for race

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min median max whitespace n_value_labels
race Race haven_labelled 0 1 6 0 1 NA 1 0 7

Value labels

Response choices
name value
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7

target_age

Age of the essay target

Distribution

Distribution of values for target_age

Distribution of values for target_age

3 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist
target_age Age of the essay target numeric 3 0.9896552 1 32 229 36.0662 16.87073 ▇▂▁▁▁

target_sex

Sex of the essay target

Distribution

Distribution of values for target_sex

Distribution of values for target_sex

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min median max whitespace n_value_labels
target_sex Sex of the essay target haven_labelled 0 1 2 0 1 NA 1 0 2

Value labels

Response choices
name value
1 1
2 2

target_race

Race of the essay target

Distribution

Distribution of values for target_race

Distribution of values for target_race

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min median max whitespace n_value_labels
target_race Race of the essay target haven_labelled 0 1 7 0 1 NA 1 0 7

Value labels

Response choices
name value
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7

heart1

Heart Manikin - Time 1

Distribution

Distribution of values for heart1

Distribution of values for heart1

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd n_value_labels hist
heart1 Heart Manikin - Time 1 haven_labelled 0 1 1 7 9 6.693103 1.810854 10 ▁▂▂▅▅▇▇▆

Value labels

Response choices
name value
lonely, rejected, isolated, disconnected 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
cared for, accepted, loved, connected 10

heart2

Heart Manikin - Time 2

Distribution

Distribution of values for heart2

Distribution of values for heart2

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd n_value_labels hist
heart2 Heart Manikin - Time 2 haven_labelled 0 1 1 5 9 5.113793 2.964172 10 ▇▃▂▂▂▃▅▅

Value labels

Response choices
name value
lonely, rejected, isolated, disconnected 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
cared for, accepted, loved, connected 10

heart3

Heart Manikin - Time 3

Distribution

Distribution of values for heart3

Distribution of values for heart3

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd n_value_labels hist
heart3 Heart Manikin - Time 3 haven_labelled 0 1 1 7 10 6.641379 2.385585 10 ▂▂▂▅▅▇▆▇

Value labels

Response choices
name value
lonely, rejected, isolated, disconnected 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
cared for, accepted, loved, connected 10

valence1

Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 1

Distribution

Distribution of values for valence1

Distribution of values for valence1

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd n_value_labels hist
valence1 Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 1 haven_labelled 0 1 1 7 9 6.575862 1.785012 10 ▁▂▁▅▅▇▅▅

Value labels

Response choices
name value
unhappy, annoyed, unsatisfied, bored 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
happy, pleased, satisfied, hopeful 10

valence2

Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2

Distribution

Distribution of values for valence2

Distribution of values for valence2

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd n_value_labels hist
valence2 Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2 haven_labelled 0 1 1 5.5 9 5.082759 2.843078 10 ▇▅▂▂▃▃▃▅

Value labels

Response choices
name value
unhappy, annoyed, unsatisfied, bored 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
happy, pleased, satisfied, hopeful 10

valence3

Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 3

Distribution

Distribution of values for valence3

Distribution of values for valence3

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd n_value_labels hist
valence3 Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 3 haven_labelled 0 1 2 7 12 6.996552 2.63789 10 ▂▁▃▇▃▁▁▃

Value labels

Response choices
name value
unhappy, annoyed, unsatisfied, bored 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
happy, pleased, satisfied, hopeful 10

arousal2

Arousal Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2

Distribution

Distribution of values for arousal2

Distribution of values for arousal2

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd n_value_labels hist
arousal2 Arousal Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2 haven_labelled 0 1 1 6 9 5.465517 2.07152 9 ▅▃▃▇▆▇▅▂

Value labels

Response choices
name value
relaxed, calm, sleepy, sluggish 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
excited, frenzied, wide-awake, aroused 9

dominance2

Dominance Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2

Distribution

Distribution of values for dominance2

Distribution of values for dominance2

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd n_value_labels hist
dominance2 Dominance Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2 haven_labelled 0 1 1 5 9 4.924138 2.264768 9 ▇▆▅▇▆▆▅▂

Value labels

Response choices
name value
submissive, influenced, controlled by others 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
in control, important, dominant, autonomous 9

nts_belonging1

How rejected did you feel?

Distribution

Distribution of values for nts_belonging1

Distribution of values for nts_belonging1

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd n_value_labels hist
nts_belonging1 How rejected did you feel? haven_labelled 0 1 0 48 100 43.51034 37.58048 2 ▇▁▁▁▂▂▃▃

Value labels

Response choices
name value
The least I could ever possibly feel 0
The most I could ever possibly feel 100

nts_belonging2

How disconnected did you feel?

Distribution

Distribution of values for nts_belonging2

Distribution of values for nts_belonging2

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd n_value_labels hist
nts_belonging2 How disconnected did you feel? haven_labelled 0 1 0 46 100 43.41379 37.49677 2 ▇▁▁▁▂▂▃▃

Value labels

Response choices
name value
The least I could ever possibly feel 0
The most I could ever possibly feel 100

nts_belonging3

How how isolated did you feel?

Distribution

Distribution of values for nts_belonging3

Distribution of values for nts_belonging3

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd n_value_labels hist
nts_belonging3 How how isolated did you feel? haven_labelled 0 1 0 38 100 42.41724 37.49604 2 ▇▁▁▁▂▂▂▃

Value labels

Response choices
name value
The least I could ever possibly feel 0
The most I could ever possibly feel 100

nts_esteem1

How meaningless did you feel

Distribution

Distribution of values for nts_esteem1

Distribution of values for nts_esteem1

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd n_value_labels hist
nts_esteem1 How meaningless did you feel haven_labelled 0 1 0 29 100 38.4069 34.79669 2 ▇▂▁▂▂▂▂▃

Value labels

Response choices
name value
The least I could ever possibly feel 0
The most I could ever possibly feel 100

nts_meaning1

How meaningless did you feel?

Distribution

Distribution of values for nts_meaning1

Distribution of values for nts_meaning1

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd n_value_labels hist
nts_meaning1 How meaningless did you feel? haven_labelled 0 1 0 24 100 35.98621 36.04889 2 ▇▂▁▁▂▂▁▂

Value labels

Response choices
name value
The least I could ever possibly feel 0
The most I could ever possibly feel 100

nts_meaning3

How insignificant did you feel?

Distribution

Distribution of values for nts_meaning3

Distribution of values for nts_meaning3

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd n_value_labels hist
nts_meaning3 How insignificant did you feel? haven_labelled 0 1 0 36 100 40.1069 36.93348 2 ▇▂▁▂▂▂▂▃

Value labels

Response choices
name value
The least I could ever possibly feel 0
The most I could ever possibly feel 100

nts_identity1

How threatened was your self-identity?

Distribution

Distribution of values for nts_identity1

Distribution of values for nts_identity1

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd n_value_labels hist
nts_identity1 How threatened was your self-identity? haven_labelled 0 1 0 11 100 26.97241 30.17009 2 ▇▁▁▂▁▁▁▁

Value labels

Response choices
name value
The least I could ever possibly feel 0
The most I could ever possibly feel 100

nts_identity2

How threatened was your sense of self?

Distribution

Distribution of values for nts_identity2

Distribution of values for nts_identity2

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd n_value_labels hist
nts_identity2 How threatened was your sense of self? haven_labelled 0 1 0 12 100 27.13793 30.14592 2 ▇▂▁▁▂▁▁▁

Value labels

Response choices
name value
The least I could ever possibly feel 0
The most I could ever possibly feel 100

nts_identity3

How much did you question who you are as a person?

Distribution

Distribution of values for nts_identity3

Distribution of values for nts_identity3

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd n_value_labels hist
nts_identity3 How much did you question who you are as a person? haven_labelled 0 1 0 18 100 31.81379 33.13378 2 ▇▂▁▁▁▂▂▂

Value labels

Response choices
name value
The least I could ever possibly feel 0
The most I could ever possibly feel 100

ladder

MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status

Distribution

Distribution of values for ladder

Distribution of values for ladder

0 missing values.

Summary statistics

name label data_type n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd hist
ladder MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status numeric 0 1 0 50 100 48.89655 19.0834 ▂▆▇▅▁

Scale: nts_belonging_mean

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Distribution of scale nts_belonging_mean

Distribution of scale nts_belonging_mean

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: nts_belonging1R, nts_belonging2R, nts_belonging3R & nts_belonging4
Observations: 290
Positive correlations: 6
Number of correlations: 6
Percentage positive correlations: 100
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.14
Omega (hierarchical): 0.11
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.14
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.96
Coefficient H: 0.97
Coefficient Alpha: 0.95

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as at least one item seems to have more than 8 levels; the highest number of distinct levels is 85 and the highest range is 101. This last number needs to be lower than 9 for the polychoric function to work. If this is unexpected, you may want to check for outliers.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

3.495, 0.28, 0.145 & 0.08

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML1
nts_belonging1R 0.899
nts_belonging2R 0.965
nts_belonging3R 0.954
nts_belonging4 0.832
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
PC1
nts_belonging1R 0.927
nts_belonging2R 0.963
nts_belonging3R 0.957
nts_belonging4 0.889
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
nts_belonging1R 56.4897 52 1412.2923 37.5805 79 2.2068 0 20 99 100 -0.071 -1.635 0.0821 290 0 290
nts_belonging2R 56.5862 54 1406.0081 37.4968 78 2.2019 0 20 98.5 100 -0.0971 -1.6448 0.0745 290 0 290
nts_belonging3R 57.5828 61.5 1405.9533 37.496 77 2.2018 0 21 98 100 -0.1777 -1.5921 0.0654 290 0 290
nts_belonging4 49.5517 50 1429.3554 37.8068 77 2.2201 0 10 87 100 0.0248 -1.6346 0.0907 290 0 290
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name label data_type value_labels n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd n_value_labels hist
nts_belonging1R NA numeric NA 0 1 0 52 100 56.48966 37.58048 NA ▆▃▂▁▇
nts_belonging2R NA numeric NA 0 1 0 54 100 56.58621 37.49677 NA ▅▃▂▂▇
nts_belonging3R NA numeric NA 0 1 0 62 100 57.58276 37.49604 NA ▅▃▂▂▇
nts_belonging4 How accepted did you feel? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
0 1 0 50 100 49.55172 37.80682 2 ▇▃▂▂▂▂▃▇

Scale: nts_esteem_mean

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Distribution of scale nts_esteem_mean

Distribution of scale nts_esteem_mean

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: nts_esteem1R, nts_esteem2 & nts_esteem3
Observations: 290
Positive correlations: 3
Number of correlations: 3
Percentage positive correlations: 100
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.91
Omega (hierarchical): 0.90
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.91
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.94
Coefficient H: 0.99
Coefficient Alpha: 0.90

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as at least one item seems to have more than 8 levels; the highest number of distinct levels is 94 and the highest range is 101. This last number needs to be lower than 9 for the polychoric function to work. If this is unexpected, you may want to check for outliers.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.514, 0.403 & 0.083

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML1
nts_esteem1R 0.704
nts_esteem2 0.921
nts_esteem3 0.993
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
PC1
nts_esteem1R 0.845
nts_esteem2 0.940
nts_esteem3 0.958
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
nts_esteem1R 61.5931 71 1210.8096 34.7967 65 2.0433 0 29 94 100 -0.4206 -1.3136 0.03 290 0 290
nts_esteem2 49.0414 50 1209.846 34.7828 69 2.0425 0 12 83 100 -0.0035 -1.4282 0.0531 290 0 290
nts_esteem3 49.0897 50 1126.8362 33.5684 65 1.9712 0 15 81 100 0.0125 -1.3926 0.0459 290 0 290
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name label data_type value_labels n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd n_value_labels hist
nts_esteem1R NA numeric NA 0 1 0 71 100 61.59310 34.79669 NA ▃▂▂▂▇
nts_esteem2 How important did you feel? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
0 1 0 50 100 49.04138 34.78284 2 ▇▃▂▃▂▃▃▆
nts_esteem3 How insignificant did you feel? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
0 1 0 50 100 49.08966 33.56838 2 ▇▃▃▃▃▃▃▆

Scale: nts_control_mean

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Distribution of scale nts_control_mean

Distribution of scale nts_control_mean

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: nts_control1, nts_control2 & nts_control3
Observations: 290
Positive correlations: 3
Number of correlations: 3
Percentage positive correlations: 100
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.90
Omega (hierarchical): 0.00
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.90
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.93
Coefficient H: 0.99
Coefficient Alpha: 0.90

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as at least one item seems to have more than 8 levels; the highest number of distinct levels is 91 and the highest range is 101. This last number needs to be lower than 9 for the polychoric function to work. If this is unexpected, you may want to check for outliers.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.481, 0.369 & 0.15

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML1
nts_control1 0.772
nts_control2 0.994
nts_control3 0.822
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
PC1
nts_control1 0.877
nts_control2 0.950
nts_control3 0.899
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
nts_control1 38.5759 34.5 840.4665 28.9908 48 1.7024 0 12 60 100 0.4003 -0.9097 0.0306 290 0 290
nts_control2 38.9966 40 869.0346 29.4794 51 1.7311 0 10 61 100 0.2899 -1.0422 0.04 290 0 290
nts_control3 40.1345 40.5 843.7777 29.0479 50 1.7057 0 14 64 100 0.1968 -1.1067 0.035 290 0 290
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name label data_type value_labels n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd n_value_labels hist
nts_control1 How influential did you feel? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
0 1 0 34 100 38.57586 28.99080 2 ▇▅▃▃▅▃▂▂
nts_control2 How much control did you feel like you had? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
0 1 0 40 100 38.99655 29.47939 2 ▇▃▂▅▃▃▂▂
nts_control3 How much ability to significantly alter events did you feel like you had? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
0 1 0 40 100 40.13448 29.04785 2 ▇▅▃▅▅▅▂▂

Scale: nts_meaning_mean

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Distribution of scale nts_meaning_mean

Distribution of scale nts_meaning_mean

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: nts_meaning1R, nts_meaning2 & nts_meaning3R
Observations: 290
Positive correlations: 3
Number of correlations: 3
Percentage positive correlations: 100
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.83
Omega (hierarchical): 0.03
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.83
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.85
Coefficient H: 0.87
Coefficient Alpha: 0.82

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as at least one item seems to have more than 8 levels; the highest number of distinct levels is 90 and the highest range is 101. This last number needs to be lower than 9 for the polychoric function to work. If this is unexpected, you may want to check for outliers.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

2.212, 0.501 & 0.288

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML1
nts_meaning1R 0.899
nts_meaning2 0.662
nts_meaning3R 0.780
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
PC1
nts_meaning1R 0.898
nts_meaning2 0.810
nts_meaning3R 0.865
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
nts_meaning1R 64.0138 76.5 1299.5223 36.0489 70 2.1169 0 29 99 100 -0.4831 -1.3264 0.0376 290 0 290
nts_meaning2 49.2448 50 1190.6146 34.5053 66 2.0262 0 15.5 82 100 -0.0087 -1.4604 0.0616 290 0 290
nts_meaning3R 59.8931 64.5 1364.082 36.9335 77 2.1688 0 22 99 100 -0.2682 -1.5334 0.0547 290 0 290
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name label data_type value_labels n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd n_value_labels hist
nts_meaning1R NA numeric NA 0 1 0 76 100 64.01379 36.04889 NA ▃▂▂▂▇
nts_meaning2 How important did you feel? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
0 1 0 50 100 49.24483 34.50528 2 ▇▅▂▃▃▃▅▆
nts_meaning3R NA numeric NA 0 1 0 64 100 59.89310 36.93348 NA ▅▃▂▂▇

Scale: nts_mean

Overview

Reliability: .

Missing: 0.

Distribution of scale nts_mean

Distribution of scale nts_mean

Reliability details

## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Scale diagnosis
Reliability (internal consistency) estimates
Scale structure
Information about this scale
Dataframe: res$dat
Items: nts_belonging4, nts_esteem2, nts_esteem3, nts_control1, nts_control2, nts_control3, nts_meaning2, nts_belonging1R, nts_belonging2R, nts_belonging3R, nts_esteem1R, nts_meaning1R & nts_meaning3R
Observations: 290
Positive correlations: 78
Number of correlations: 78
Percentage positive correlations: 100
Estimates assuming interval level
Omega (total): 0.97
Omega (hierarchical): 0.81
Revelle’s Omega (total): 0.97
Greatest Lower Bound (GLB): 0.97
Coefficient H: 0.97
Coefficient Alpha: 0.96

(Estimates assuming ordinal level not computed, as at least one item seems to have more than 8 levels; the highest number of distinct levels is 94 and the highest range is 101. This last number needs to be lower than 9 for the polychoric function to work. If this is unexpected, you may want to check for outliers.)

Note: the normal point estimate and confidence interval for omega are based on the procedure suggested by Dunn, Baguley & Brunsden (2013) using the MBESS function ci.reliability, whereas the psych package point estimate was suggested in Revelle & Zinbarg (2008). See the help (‘?ufs::scaleStructure’) for more information.

Eigen values

8.722, 1.526, 0.492, 0.433, 0.359, 0.303, 0.288, 0.258, 0.201, 0.157, 0.116, 0.076 & 0.069

Factor analysis (reproducing only shared variance)
ML1 ML2
nts_belonging4 0.589 0.379
nts_esteem2 0.318 0.649
nts_esteem3 0.319 0.679
nts_control1 -0.066 0.803
nts_control2 -0.059 0.916
nts_control3 -0.093 0.888
nts_meaning2 0.349 0.545
nts_belonging1R 0.902 0.005
nts_belonging2R 0.967 -0.030
nts_belonging3R 0.995 -0.054
nts_esteem1R 0.712 0.150
nts_meaning1R 0.832 0.013
nts_meaning3R 0.740 0.013
Component analysis (reproducing full covariance matrix)
TC1 TC2
nts_belonging4 0.630 0.360
nts_esteem2 0.448 0.545
nts_esteem3 0.441 0.584
nts_control1 -0.084 0.899
nts_control2 -0.025 0.943
nts_control3 -0.036 0.898
nts_meaning2 0.410 0.530
nts_belonging1R 0.925 -0.015
nts_belonging2R 0.932 0.002
nts_belonging3R 0.965 -0.031
nts_esteem1R 0.804 0.081
nts_meaning1R 0.911 -0.051
nts_meaning3R 0.854 -0.076
Item descriptives
mean median var sd IQR se min q1 q3 max skew kurt dip n NA valid
nts_belonging4 49.5517 50 1429.3554 37.8068 77 2.2201 0 10 87 100 0.0248 -1.6346 0.0907 290 0 290
nts_esteem2 49.0414 50 1209.846 34.7828 69 2.0425 0 12 83 100 -0.0035 -1.4282 0.0531 290 0 290
nts_esteem3 49.0897 50 1126.8362 33.5684 65 1.9712 0 15 81 100 0.0125 -1.3926 0.0459 290 0 290
nts_control1 38.5759 34.5 840.4665 28.9908 48 1.7024 0 12 60 100 0.4003 -0.9097 0.0306 290 0 290
nts_control2 38.9966 40 869.0346 29.4794 51 1.7311 0 10 61 100 0.2899 -1.0422 0.04 290 0 290
nts_control3 40.1345 40.5 843.7777 29.0479 50 1.7057 0 14 64 100 0.1968 -1.1067 0.035 290 0 290
nts_meaning2 49.2448 50 1190.6146 34.5053 66 2.0262 0 15.5 82 100 -0.0087 -1.4604 0.0616 290 0 290
nts_belonging1R 56.4897 52 1412.2923 37.5805 79 2.2068 0 20 99 100 -0.071 -1.635 0.0821 290 0 290
nts_belonging2R 56.5862 54 1406.0081 37.4968 78 2.2019 0 20 98.5 100 -0.0971 -1.6448 0.0745 290 0 290
nts_belonging3R 57.5828 61.5 1405.9533 37.496 77 2.2018 0 21 98 100 -0.1777 -1.5921 0.0654 290 0 290
nts_esteem1R 61.5931 71 1210.8096 34.7967 65 2.0433 0 29 94 100 -0.4206 -1.3136 0.03 290 0 290
nts_meaning1R 64.0138 76.5 1299.5223 36.0489 70 2.1169 0 29 99 100 -0.4831 -1.3264 0.0376 290 0 290
nts_meaning3R 59.8931 64.5 1364.082 36.9335 77 2.1688 0 22 99 100 -0.2682 -1.5334 0.0547 290 0 290
Scattermatrix
Scatterplot

Scatterplot


## No viewer found, probably documenting or testing

Summary statistics

name label data_type value_labels n_missing complete_rate min median max mean sd n_value_labels hist
nts_belonging4 How accepted did you feel? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
0 1 0 50 100 49.55172 37.80682 2 ▇▃▂▂▂▂▃▇
nts_esteem2 How important did you feel? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
0 1 0 50 100 49.04138 34.78284 2 ▇▃▂▃▂▃▃▆
nts_esteem3 How insignificant did you feel? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
0 1 0 50 100 49.08966 33.56838 2 ▇▃▃▃▃▃▃▆
nts_control1 How influential did you feel? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
0 1 0 34 100 38.57586 28.99080 2 ▇▅▃▃▅▃▂▂
nts_control2 How much control did you feel like you had? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
0 1 0 40 100 38.99655 29.47939 2 ▇▃▂▅▃▃▂▂
nts_control3 How much ability to significantly alter events did you feel like you had? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
0 1 0 40 100 40.13448 29.04785 2 ▇▅▃▅▅▅▂▂
nts_meaning2 How important did you feel? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
0 1 0 50 100 49.24483 34.50528 2 ▇▅▂▃▃▃▅▆
nts_belonging1R NA numeric NA 0 1 0 52 100 56.48966 37.58048 NA ▆▃▂▁▇
nts_belonging2R NA numeric NA 0 1 0 54 100 56.58621 37.49677 NA ▅▃▂▂▇
nts_belonging3R NA numeric NA 0 1 0 62 100 57.58276 37.49604 NA ▅▃▂▂▇
nts_esteem1R NA numeric NA 0 1 0 71 100 61.59310 34.79669 NA ▃▂▂▂▇
nts_meaning1R NA numeric NA 0 1 0 76 100 64.01379 36.04889 NA ▃▂▂▂▇
nts_meaning3R NA numeric NA 0 1 0 64 100 59.89310 36.93348 NA ▅▃▂▂▇

Missingness report

Codebook table

name label data_type value_labels scale_item_names n_missing complete_rate n_unique empty min median max mean sd whitespace n_value_labels hist
id Participant ID numeric NA NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 1 146 298 146.465517 85.302802 NA NA ▇▇▇▇▇
finished Finished the survey character NA NA 0 1.0000000 2 0 1 NA 1 NA NA 0 NA NA
acceptance Acceptance condition haven_labelled 1. Acceptance,
0. Rejection
NA 0 1.0000000 2 0 1 NA 1 NA NA 0 2 NA
closeness Closeness to the essay target haven_labelled 0. Distant Other,
1. Close Other
NA 0 1.0000000 2 0 1 NA 1 NA NA 0 2 NA
age Age numeric NA NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 18 31 66 33.213793 9.617017 NA NA ▆▇▂▂▁
sex Sex haven_labelled 1. Male,
2. Female
NA 0 1.0000000 2 0 1 NA 1 NA NA 0 2 NA
race Race haven_labelled 1. White,
2. Black,
3. Asian,
4. Hispanic,
5. Native American,
6. Bi-Racial or Multi-Racial,
7. Other
NA 0 1.0000000 6 0 1 NA 1 NA NA 0 7 NA
target_age Age of the essay target numeric NA NA 3 0.9896552 NA NA 1 32 229 36.066202 16.870728 NA NA ▇▂▁▁▁
target_sex Sex of the essay target haven_labelled 1. Male,
2. Female
NA 0 1.0000000 2 0 1 NA 1 NA NA 0 2 NA
target_race Race of the essay target haven_labelled 1. White,
2. Black,
3. Asian,
4. Hispanic,
5. Native American,
6. Bi-Racial or Multi-Racial,
7. Other
NA 0 1.0000000 7 0 1 NA 1 NA NA 0 7 NA
heart1 Heart Manikin - Time 1 haven_labelled 1. lonely, rejected, isolated, disconnected,
2. 2,
3. 3,
4. 4,
5. 5,
6. 6,
7. 7,
8. 8,
9. 9,
10. cared for, accepted, loved, connected
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 1 7.0 9 6.693103 1.810854 NA 10 ▁▂▂▅▅▇▇▆
heart2 Heart Manikin - Time 2 haven_labelled 1. lonely, rejected, isolated, disconnected,
2. 2,
3. 3,
4. 4,
5. 5,
6. 6,
7. 7,
8. 8,
9. 9,
10. cared for, accepted, loved, connected
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 1 5.0 9 5.113793 2.964172 NA 10 ▇▃▂▂▂▃▅▅
heart3 Heart Manikin - Time 3 haven_labelled 1. lonely, rejected, isolated, disconnected,
2. 2,
3. 3,
4. 4,
5. 5,
6. 6,
7. 7,
8. 8,
9. 9,
10. cared for, accepted, loved, connected
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 1 7.0 10 6.641379 2.385585 NA 10 ▂▂▂▅▅▇▆▇
valence1 Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 1 haven_labelled 1. unhappy, annoyed, unsatisfied, bored,
2. 2,
3. 3,
4. 4,
5. 5,
6. 6,
7. 7,
8. 8,
9. 9,
10. happy, pleased, satisfied, hopeful
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 1 7.0 9 6.575862 1.785012 NA 10 ▁▂▁▅▅▇▅▅
valence2 Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2 haven_labelled 1. unhappy, annoyed, unsatisfied, bored,
2. 2,
3. 3,
4. 4,
5. 5,
6. 6,
7. 7,
8. 8,
9. 9,
10. happy, pleased, satisfied, hopeful
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 1 5.5 9 5.082759 2.843078 NA 10 ▇▅▂▂▃▃▃▅
valence3 Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 3 haven_labelled 1. unhappy, annoyed, unsatisfied, bored,
2. 2,
3. 3,
4. 4,
5. 5,
6. 6,
7. 7,
8. 8,
9. 9,
10. happy, pleased, satisfied, hopeful
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 2 7.0 12 6.996552 2.637890 NA 10 ▂▁▃▇▃▁▁▃
arousal2 Arousal Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2 haven_labelled 1. relaxed, calm, sleepy, sluggish,
2. 2,
3. 3,
4. 4,
5. 5,
6. 6,
7. 7,
8. 8,
9. excited, frenzied, wide-awake, aroused
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 1 6.0 9 5.465517 2.071520 NA 9 ▅▃▃▇▆▇▅▂
dominance2 Dominance Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2 haven_labelled 1. submissive, influenced, controlled by others,
2. 2,
3. 3,
4. 4,
5. 5,
6. 6,
7. 7,
8. 8,
9. in control, important, dominant, autonomous
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 1 5.0 9 4.924138 2.264768 NA 9 ▇▆▅▇▆▆▅▂
nts_belonging1 How rejected did you feel? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 48.0 100 43.510345 37.580477 NA 2 ▇▁▁▁▂▂▃▃
nts_belonging2 How disconnected did you feel? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 46.0 100 43.413793 37.496775 NA 2 ▇▁▁▁▂▂▃▃
nts_belonging3 How how isolated did you feel? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 38.5 100 42.417241 37.496044 NA 2 ▇▁▁▁▂▂▂▃
nts_belonging4 How accepted did you feel? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 50.0 100 49.551724 37.806818 NA 2 ▇▃▂▂▂▂▃▇
nts_esteem1 How meaningless did you feel haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 29.0 100 38.406897 34.796690 NA 2 ▇▂▁▂▂▂▂▃
nts_esteem2 How important did you feel? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 50.0 100 49.041379 34.782841 NA 2 ▇▃▂▃▂▃▃▆
nts_esteem3 How insignificant did you feel? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 50.0 100 49.089655 33.568381 NA 2 ▇▃▃▃▃▃▃▆
nts_control1 How influential did you feel? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 34.5 100 38.575862 28.990801 NA 2 ▇▅▃▃▅▃▂▂
nts_control2 How much control did you feel like you had? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 40.0 100 38.996552 29.479393 NA 2 ▇▃▂▅▃▃▂▂
nts_control3 How much ability to significantly alter events did you feel like you had? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 40.5 100 40.134483 29.047852 NA 2 ▇▅▃▅▅▅▂▂
nts_meaning1 How meaningless did you feel? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 23.5 100 35.986207 36.048888 NA 2 ▇▂▁▁▂▂▁▂
nts_meaning2 How important did you feel? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 50.0 100 49.244828 34.505283 NA 2 ▇▅▂▃▃▃▅▆
nts_meaning3 How insignificant did you feel? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 35.5 100 40.106897 36.933480 NA 2 ▇▂▁▂▂▂▂▃
nts_identity1 How threatened was your self-identity? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 11.0 100 26.972414 30.170093 NA 2 ▇▁▁▂▁▁▁▁
nts_identity2 How threatened was your sense of self? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 12.0 100 27.137931 30.145924 NA 2 ▇▂▁▁▂▁▁▁
nts_identity3 How much did you question who you are as a person? haven_labelled 0. The least I could ever possibly feel,
100. The most I could ever possibly feel
NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 18.0 100 31.813793 33.133783 NA 2 ▇▂▁▁▁▂▂▂
ladder MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status numeric NA NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 50 100 48.896552 19.083399 NA NA ▂▆▇▅▁
nts_belonging1R NA numeric NA NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 52 100 56.489655 37.580477 NA NA ▆▃▂▁▇
nts_belonging2R NA numeric NA NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 54 100 56.586207 37.496775 NA NA ▅▃▂▂▇
nts_belonging3R NA numeric NA NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 62 100 57.582759 37.496044 NA NA ▅▃▂▂▇
nts_esteem1R NA numeric NA NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 71 100 61.593103 34.796690 NA NA ▃▂▂▂▇
nts_meaning1R NA numeric NA NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 76 100 64.013793 36.048888 NA NA ▃▂▂▂▇
nts_meaning3R NA numeric NA NA 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 64 100 59.893103 36.933480 NA NA ▅▃▂▂▇
nts_belonging_mean 4 nts_belonging items aggregated by rowMeans numeric NA nts_belonging1R, nts_belonging2R, nts_belonging3R, nts_belonging4 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 53 100 55.052586 35.123682 NA NA ▆▅▂▂▇
nts_esteem_mean 3 nts_esteem items aggregated by rowMeans numeric NA nts_esteem1R, nts_esteem2, nts_esteem3 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 52 100 53.241379 31.422338 NA NA ▆▅▅▅▇
nts_control_mean 3 nts_control items aggregated by rowMeans numeric NA nts_control1, nts_control2, nts_control3 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 40 100 39.235632 26.523492 NA NA ▇▆▆▅▂
nts_meaning_mean 3 nts_meaning items aggregated by rowMeans numeric NA nts_meaning1R, nts_meaning2, nts_meaning3R 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 58 100 57.717241 30.765095 NA NA ▃▃▅▃▇
nts_mean 13 nts items aggregated by rowMeans numeric NA nts_belonging4, nts_esteem2, nts_esteem3, nts_control1, nts_control2, nts_control3, nts_meaning2, nts_belonging1R, nts_belonging2R, nts_belonging3R, nts_esteem1R, nts_meaning1R, nts_meaning3R 0 1.0000000 NA NA 0 53 100 51.599469 28.326876 NA NA ▇▇▆▇▇
JSON-LD metadata

The following JSON-LD can be found by search engines, if you share this codebook publicly on the web.

{
  "name": "codebook_data",
  "datePublished": "2021-01-20",
  "description": "The dataset has N=290 rows and 46 columns.\n287 rows have no missing values on any column.\n\n\n## Table of variables\nThis table contains variable names, labels, and number of missing values.\nSee the complete codebook for more.\n\n[truncated]\n\n### Note\nThis dataset was automatically described using the [codebook R package](https://rubenarslan.github.io/codebook/) (version 0.9.2).",
  "keywords": ["id", "finished", "acceptance", "closeness", "age", "sex", "race", "target_age", "target_sex", "target_race", "heart1", "heart2", "heart3", "valence1", "valence2", "valence3", "arousal2", "dominance2", "nts_belonging1", "nts_belonging2", "nts_belonging3", "nts_belonging4", "nts_esteem1", "nts_esteem2", "nts_esteem3", "nts_control1", "nts_control2", "nts_control3", "nts_meaning1", "nts_meaning2", "nts_meaning3", "nts_identity1", "nts_identity2", "nts_identity3", "ladder", "nts_belonging1R", "nts_belonging2R", "nts_belonging3R", "nts_esteem1R", "nts_meaning1R", "nts_meaning3R", "nts_belonging_mean", "nts_esteem_mean", "nts_control_mean", "nts_meaning_mean", "nts_mean"],
  "@context": "http://schema.org/",
  "@type": "Dataset",
  "variableMeasured": [
    {
      "name": "id",
      "description": "Participant ID",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "finished",
      "description": "Finished the survey",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "acceptance",
      "description": "Acceptance condition",
      "value": "1. Acceptance,\n0. Rejection",
      "maxValue": "1",
      "minValue": "0",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "closeness",
      "description": "Closeness to the essay target",
      "value": "0. Distant Other,\n1. Close Other",
      "maxValue": "1",
      "minValue": "0",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "age",
      "description": "Age",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "sex",
      "description": "Sex",
      "value": "1. Male,\n2. Female",
      "maxValue": "2",
      "minValue": "1",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "race",
      "description": "Race",
      "value": "1. White,\n2. Black,\n3. Asian,\n4. Hispanic,\n5. Native American,\n6. Bi-Racial or Multi-Racial,\n7. Other",
      "maxValue": "7",
      "minValue": "1",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "target_age",
      "description": "Age of the essay target",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "target_sex",
      "description": "Sex of the essay target",
      "value": "1. Male,\n2. Female",
      "maxValue": "2",
      "minValue": "1",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "target_race",
      "description": "Race of the essay target",
      "value": "1. White,\n2. Black,\n3. Asian,\n4. Hispanic,\n5. Native American,\n6. Bi-Racial or Multi-Racial,\n7. Other",
      "maxValue": "7",
      "minValue": "1",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "heart1",
      "description": "Heart Manikin - Time 1",
      "value": "1. lonely, rejected, isolated, disconnected,\n2. 2,\n3. 3,\n4. 4,\n5. 5,\n6. 6,\n7. 7,\n8. 8,\n9. 9,\n10. cared for, accepted, loved, connected",
      "maxValue": 10,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "heart2",
      "description": "Heart Manikin - Time 2",
      "value": "1. lonely, rejected, isolated, disconnected,\n2. 2,\n3. 3,\n4. 4,\n5. 5,\n6. 6,\n7. 7,\n8. 8,\n9. 9,\n10. cared for, accepted, loved, connected",
      "maxValue": 10,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "heart3",
      "description": "Heart Manikin - Time 3",
      "value": "1. lonely, rejected, isolated, disconnected,\n2. 2,\n3. 3,\n4. 4,\n5. 5,\n6. 6,\n7. 7,\n8. 8,\n9. 9,\n10. cared for, accepted, loved, connected",
      "maxValue": 10,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "valence1",
      "description": "Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 1",
      "value": "1. unhappy, annoyed, unsatisfied, bored,\n2. 2,\n3. 3,\n4. 4,\n5. 5,\n6. 6,\n7. 7,\n8. 8,\n9. 9,\n10. happy, pleased, satisfied, hopeful",
      "maxValue": 10,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "valence2",
      "description": "Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2",
      "value": "1. unhappy, annoyed, unsatisfied, bored,\n2. 2,\n3. 3,\n4. 4,\n5. 5,\n6. 6,\n7. 7,\n8. 8,\n9. 9,\n10. happy, pleased, satisfied, hopeful",
      "maxValue": 10,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "valence3",
      "description": "Valence Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 3",
      "value": "1. unhappy, annoyed, unsatisfied, bored,\n2. 2,\n3. 3,\n4. 4,\n5. 5,\n6. 6,\n7. 7,\n8. 8,\n9. 9,\n10. happy, pleased, satisfied, hopeful",
      "maxValue": 10,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "arousal2",
      "description": "Arousal Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2",
      "value": "1. relaxed, calm, sleepy, sluggish,\n2. 2,\n3. 3,\n4. 4,\n5. 5,\n6. 6,\n7. 7,\n8. 8,\n9. excited, frenzied, wide-awake, aroused",
      "maxValue": 9,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "dominance2",
      "description": "Dominance Self-Assessment Manikin - Time 2",
      "value": "1. submissive, influenced, controlled by others,\n2. 2,\n3. 3,\n4. 4,\n5. 5,\n6. 6,\n7. 7,\n8. 8,\n9. in control, important, dominant, autonomous",
      "maxValue": 9,
      "minValue": 1,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_belonging1",
      "description": "How rejected did you feel?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_belonging2",
      "description": "How disconnected did you feel?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_belonging3",
      "description": "How how isolated did you feel?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_belonging4",
      "description": "How accepted did you feel?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_esteem1",
      "description": "How meaningless did you feel",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_esteem2",
      "description": "How important did you feel?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_esteem3",
      "description": "How insignificant did you feel?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_control1",
      "description": "How influential did you feel?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_control2",
      "description": "How much control did you feel like you had?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_control3",
      "description": "How much ability to significantly alter events did you feel like you had?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_meaning1",
      "description": "How meaningless did you feel?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_meaning2",
      "description": "How important did you feel?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_meaning3",
      "description": "How insignificant did you feel?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_identity1",
      "description": "How threatened was your self-identity?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_identity2",
      "description": "How threatened was your sense of self?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_identity3",
      "description": "How much did you question who you are as a person?",
      "value": "0. The least I could ever possibly feel,\n100. The most I could ever possibly feel",
      "maxValue": 100,
      "minValue": 0,
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "ladder",
      "description": "MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_belonging1R",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_belonging2R",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_belonging3R",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_esteem1R",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_meaning1R",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_meaning3R",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_belonging_mean",
      "description": "4 nts_belonging items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_esteem_mean",
      "description": "3 nts_esteem items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_control_mean",
      "description": "3 nts_control items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_meaning_mean",
      "description": "3 nts_meaning items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    },
    {
      "name": "nts_mean",
      "description": "13 nts items aggregated by rowMeans",
      "@type": "propertyValue"
    }
  ]
}`